What Strava is good for

To be fair, let's start with what Strava can do - and does well. It records your route via GPS, shows pace, elevation profile and heart rate, compares you with others on segments and bundles it all into a social feed. Anyone who wants to see performance, stay motivated and measure up against friends is in the right place there.

The point isn't that Strava is bad. The point is that it pursues a different goal than a diary. Strava answers "How fast and how strong was I?". A tour diary answers "How was the ride - and what do I want to keep from it?". That's a difference you only really notice after a few months.

Where Strava hits its limits as a diary

As soon as it comes to capturing and rediscovering, the gaps show:

It's not an either-or question. Many people record with Strava on the go and keep a diary alongside for capturing and analysing. Via GPX import, the Strava ride lands in the diary too with just a few clicks.

What a tour diary does differently

A tour diary flips the perspective: performance isn't the focus, the ride as a whole is - with everything no GPS signal captures. That's exactly what Tourtagebuch is made for.

And the data stays yours: a database on a German server, no public feed, no ads. For what documenting looks like in detail, see the article Documenting bike rides.

Try Tourtagebuch free for 30 days - no payment details. Then €22.90 a year, cancel anytime.

Start for free

In a nutshell

Strava is strong at recording, comparing and motivating - that's what it's built for. When it comes to capturing and rating individual rides, rediscovering them years later and bundling every sport into one personal diary, it hits its limits. If that's exactly what you're after, a digital tour diary serves you better - and you can combine the two by simply moving the recorded ride into the diary via GPX.